1. I believe that I am already working pretty well with Gee’s concepts in my first and second main body paragraphs. I explain his overall topic of building tasks as well as go in with specific examples of connections and significance and how they apply to scientific discourse as a whole. How significance allows for an individual to see the building of texts. As well as connections allowing for the reader to establish similarities and differences among others. Not only tis but connections allows for the reader to understand how a scientific work relates to society and the field, its impact. I will use these as a template to rewrite my last body paragraph, perhaps with a new topic. I will choose a building task and explain how it relates to an aspect necessary in scientific discourse and why this shows in depth understanding.
  2. Again I believe my first two body paragraphs show strong evidence, I think I picked buildable quotes that I can elaborate on yet they get my point across.
  3. In my last paragraph if I incorporated Gee instead of two Haas examples then it would be significantly stronger. Although I may explore into the following potential ideas: understanding relationships – notice the difference between laysayers and intellectuals and discussion, understanding the impact on the science community as a whole. 
  4. Overall my paper is centrally about how scientific discourse requires in depth understanding. As I mentioned above, specifically how significance shows building of scientific works and how connections allow for readers to show similarities and differences. And most importantly how they show impact on the scientific community as a whole and the world.